Realty Executives of Northern Arizona
In today’s digital-first real estate environment, many clients begin their home search with Zillow. The Zestimate has become a familiar reference point, often shaping seller expectations and buyer perceptions before an agent ever enters the conversation. While Zestimates offer convenience, experienced real estate agents know they frequently miss the mark—and sometimes by a wide margin.
Understanding why Zestimates can be inaccurate helps agents educate clients, set realistic expectations, and reinforce the value of professional expertise.
Zillow’s Zestimate is generated by an automated valuation model (AVM) that analyzes public records, historical sales, and nearby comparables. What it does not do is walk through the home, evaluate workmanship, or understand buyer psychology.
Unlike agents, algorithms cannot assess condition, flow, natural light, curb appeal, or pride of ownership—factors that often determine how buyers perceive value and how aggressively they compete for a property.
Agents know that upgrades sell homes, but Zillow often doesn’t see them. A remodeled kitchen, new roof, upgraded HVAC, or high-end finishes may not be reflected in public data. As a result, homes with extensive improvements may be undervalued, while outdated or poorly maintained homes may appear overpriced online.
This disconnect is especially common in markets with older housing stock or where renovations are frequent.
Real estate is local—sometimes block by block. This is especially pertinent to the Flagstaff area. School boundaries, traffic patterns, views, zoning changes, national forests, and neighborhood reputation all influence value. Agents track these nuances daily; algorithms struggle to capture them.
In fast-moving or transitioning markets, Zestimates often lag behind reality. Agents see buyer demand, multiple-offer situations, and price adjustments in real time—long before those trends appear in an AVM.
Zestimates rely heavily on public records, which are often incomplete or inaccurate. Incorrect square footage, missing additions, wrong bedroom counts, or unrecorded improvements can significantly skew values. Even when homeowners claim their property and update details, the Zestimate may not meaningfully adjust.
Agents, on the other hand, verify data, measure homes, and reconcile discrepancies before pricing a property.
Custom homes, luxury properties, rural estates, historic residences, and mixed-use properties are notoriously difficult for automated models to price. With limited comparable sales, Zestimates become educated guesses at best.
Agents fill this gap by expanding comp criteria, adjusting for qualitative differences, and applying professional judgment—something no algorithm can replicate.
One of the biggest challenges agents face is helping clients separate online estimates from market reality. Sellers may anchor to a high Zestimate, while buyers may use a low one to justify unrealistic offers.
By explaining the limitations of Zestimates and presenting a data-backed comparative market analysis (CMA), agents reposition themselves as trusted advisors rather than salespeople.
Instead of dismissing the Zestimate outright, savvy agents use it as a conversation starter:
This approach builds credibility and demonstrates value through education.
Zillow’s Zestimate can provide a broad snapshot, but it cannot replace local expertise, on-the-ground insight, or professional analysis. Real estate agents bring context, accuracy, and strategy—qualities no algorithm can fully replicate.
For agents, the goal isn’t to compete with Zestimates, but to clarify their limitations and show clients why informed human judgment still matters most in determining a home’s true market value.
When you are looking for accurate, local information about the real estate market in Northern Arizona, come on in and see us or give us a call. Our office is proud to have been voted the Best Real Estate Agency/Company in Flagstaff for 5 years in a row. Let us show you what we can do together!