x
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Showing 1 of 11
X
Save

368 Harman Park
Pagosa Springs CO 81147 US

$770,000

Active Listing ID 784118
lot icon
Lot: 5.17 acre
home icon
Other

$770,000

Active Listing ID 784118
Save

368 Harman Park Debra Zenz, Jim Smith Realty, CELL: 970-946-1887, debzenz@jimsmithrealty.com, www.JimSmithRealty.com: Pagosa Springs commercial business park centrally located with great highway exposure AND ZONED MIXED-USE CORRIDOR. Possible Owner Finance Available. Level lot for building with mountain views and great exposure. Perfect location in-between "downtown" and Pagosa Lakes "uptown". With Highway 160 frontage, this parcel is seen by all traffic heading westbound and eastbound. In this business park you'll find underground utilities available which include electric, natural gas, water and sewer, cement sidewalks. The paved road will take you to end of Harman Park Dr to this level, easy build site that is both adjacent to Harman Park Dr and Highway 160. The POA dues are only $150 a year. Included in this price is a Conceptual Master Plan prepared by SJI Concepts Gebhart Studio for "The Pagosa Hotel". This parcel is conveniently located to all amenities: Shopping, Grocery, Pagosa Springs Medical Center, Golf Course, entertainment, recreation center, national forest, skiing, snowboarding and the world famous hot springs; all only minutes away. The property is easily accessed year round with paved roads. MIXED-USE CORRIDOR. Buyer Broker and buyer should consult with Town of Pagosa for specific building code Zoned Lot.

Collapse all

Property Features

  • Facts
  • Lot Size: 5.17 acre
  • Property Type: Lots And Land
  • Property Sub-type: Other
  • Features
  • Roof Type: Unknown
Listing Changed: 9/28/2021 3:31:02 AM GMT
Source Updated Date: 12/6/2021 6:30:03 AM GMT

Courtesy of: Debra Zenz, Jim Smith Realty

Listing Source - ListHub

Copyright © 2021 Colorado Real Estate Network Inc. All rights reserved. All information provided by the listing agent/broker is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed and should be independently verified.